The piece argues that private AI firms are becoming geopolitical actors, with influence that now rivals or exceeds many states. Middle powers risk missing out because they are not leading AI development or supply chains.
01Summary
- 01The article says Mark Carney told middle powers at Davos in January to get “at the table” or end up “on the menu”.
- 02Nvidia’s market value is described as just below Germany’s annual GDP and just ahead of Japan’s, while Apple’s sits below Japan but above India’s.
- 03The text says biotechnology firms developed and distributed the mRNA vaccines that helped end the COVID-19 pandemic, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company underpins global electronics and innovation.
- 04Anthropic said its Claude model was misused or attempted to be misused in cases involving a Southeast Asian government agency, an undersea weapons system, and suspected Russia-based actors.
- 05Stanford University’s 2026 Artificial Intelligence Index report says the U.S. had 59 notable AI models through 2025, China had 35, and South Korea had eight.
02Why it matters
If the argument is right, the balance of power in AI is shifting towards companies rather than governments. That affects where investment, regulation and strategic influence will concentrate.
Answers are generated by AI from the story summary; they are not investment, health or legal advice.





